US Hegemony in World Politics Notes Class 12 CBSE

Beginning of the ‘New World Order’ by the US

(i) The disintegration of USSR led to the beginning of the US hegemony in 1991. It remained with all its powers and enhanced and intact.

(ii) Kuwait was invaded by Iraq in August in 1990 and was subsequently annexed. After a series of diplomatic attempts failed at convincing Iraq to quit its aggression, the United Nations mandated the liberation of Kuwait by force. This decision was hailed by the US President George HW Bush as the emergence of a ‘New World Order.’

(iii) The First Gulf War took place in which Iraq was defeated by a coalition force of 6,60,000 troops from 34 countries. It was known as ‘Operation Desert Strom’ or ‘First Gulf War’.

(iv) The was was overwhelmingly American. It revealed the vast technological gap that had opened up between the US military capability and other countries.

The Clinton Years

(i) George HW Bush lost the US Presidential elections of 1992 to William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton of the Democratic Party.

(ii) During this era, it was believed that the US had withdrawn into its internal affairs and was not fully engaged in world politics.

(iii) The government led by Clinton focused on ‘soft issues’ like democracy promotion, climate change and world trade rather than ‘hard politics’.

(iv) Still, the US showed its military powers. Firstly, in 1999 in response to Yugoslavian actions against the pre-dominantly Albanian population in the province of Kosovo. Secondly, in response to the bombing of the US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar-es-Salaam.

(v) ‘Operation Infinite Reach’, launched by the US, was a series of cruise missile strikes on Al-Qaeda terrorists targets in Sudan and Afghanistan.

9/11 and the ‘Global War on Terror’

(i) On 11th September 2001, four American commercial aircrafts were hijacked and flew into important buildings in the US.

(ii) The first and second airline crashed into the North and South Towers of the World Trade Centre (New York), the third crashed into the Pentagon building (Arlington, Virginia) and the fourth aircraft down in a field in Pennsylvania. These attacks came to be known as ‘9/11’.

(iii) The US response to 9/11 was swift and ferocious. George W Bush had succeeded Clinton in the US Presidency.

(iv) The operation was against all those suspected to be behind the 9/11 attack, mainly Al-Qaeda and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

(v) Arrests were made all over the world by the US forces often without the knowledge of the government of the persons being arrested.

(vi) These persons were transported across countries and detained in secret prisons.

The Iraq Invasion

(i) ‘Operation Iraqi Freedom’ was launched by the US on 19th March, 2003 and was joined by more than forty other countries.

(ii) The purpose of the invasion was to prevent Iraq from developing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).

(iii) As there was no evidence of WMD, it is speculated that the invasion was motivated by other objectives such as controlling Iraqi oilfields, etc.

(iv) The US invasion of Iraq was both a military and political failure as around 3000 US military personnel were lost and Iraqi casualties were much higher.

Constraints on American Power

(i) There are three constraints on American power. The institutional architecture of the America is the first constant.

(ii) The second constraint is domestic in nature ad stems from the open nature of American society. There is a deep scepticism regarding the purposes and methods of government in American political culture.

(iii) The third constraint on American power is the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) which is only organisation in the international system that could possibly moderate the exercise of American power.

India’s Relationship with the US

(i) During the Cold War, India’s closest friendship was with the Soviet Union.

(ii) Over the years, India decided to liberalise its economy and integrate it with the global economy. This made India an attractive economic partner for a number of countries including the US.

(iii) Two new factors emerged in Indo-US relations in recent years. They include:

(a) Technological dimension
(b) The role of the Indian-American diaspora.

(iv) There are three different strategies to decide what kind of relationship India should have with USA. They are as follows:

(a) Those Indian analysts who see international politics in terms of military power, prefer that India should maintain its distance from the US and should focus upon increasing is own national power.

(b) Other analysts see the growing convergence of interests between US and India as a historic opportunity for India.

(c) A third group of analysts advocate that India should take the lead in establishing the coalition of countries from developing world.

(v) Indo-US relations are too difficult to manage by a sole strategy. There should be mixing of foreign policy strategies of deal with the US.

Meaning of Hegemony

(i) The word ‘hegemony’ means the leadership or predominance of one state over others by virtue of its military, economic, political power and cultural superiority.

(ii) Politics is all about gaining power. In world politics, countries and groups of countries are engaged in constantly trying to gain and retain power.

(iii) It is important to understand the distribution of power among the countries of the world in order to understand world politics.

(iv) During the Cold War Era, there were two superpowers, the US and the USSR. But after the disintegration of USSR, only a single power was left i.e. the US.

(v) The international system dominated by a sole superpower or hyper-power is sometimes called a ‘unipolar system’.

Hegemony as Hard Power

(i) Hegemony related to the relations, patterns and balances of military capability between states.

(ii) The base of US power lies in the overwhelming superiority of its military power. It is both absolute and relative.

(iii) The military dominance of the US is not just based on higher spending but on a qualitative gap.

(iv) But still, the US invasion of Iraq reveals weakness of American power as it was not able to force the Iraqi people into submitting to the occupations forces of the US-led coalition.

Hegemony as Structural Power

(i) The idea behind this type of hegemony is that an open world economy requires a hegemon or dominant power to support its creation and existence.

(ii) In this sense, hegemony is reflected in the role played by the US in providing global public goods. The best examples of global public goods are Sea-Lanes of Communication (SLOCs), Internet, roads etc.

(iii) The economic preponderance of the US is inseparable from its structural power, which is the power to shape the global economy in a particular way.

(iv) Another example of the structural power of the US is the academic degree called the Masters in Business Administration (MBA). The idea of teaching skills for business is uniquely American.

Hegemony as Soft Power

(i) In this type of hegemony, it implies class ascendancy in the school, political and particularly ideological spheres.

(ii) It suggests that a dominant power not only possess military power but also ideological resources to shape the behvaiour of competing and lesser powers.

(iii) The US predominance in the world is based on only on its military power and economic powers but on its cultural presence.

(iv) During the Cold War, the US scored notable victories in the area of structural power and soft power rather than hard power.

Overcoming the Hegemony

(i) It is important to understand that there is no single power to balance the US military. There are various strategies which can be helpful to overcome the hegemony.

(ii) According to the Bandwagon Strategy, it is suggested that instead of engaging in activities opposed to the hegemonic power, it is advisable to extract benefits by operating within the hegemonic system.

(iii) Hide Strategy implies staying as far removed from the dominant power as possible. China, Russia and the European Union are many examples of this behaviour.

(iv) Another belief is that resistance to American hegemony may come from non-state actors rather than other states. It is believed that challenges to US hegemony will come from a combination of Non-Government Organisations (NGOs), social movements and public opinion.